We need a...Blog Hero
    Blog Home     Schaad Design     AccuWeather.com    
About Me
Notable (?)
Recent Comments
Search
Categories
Archives
June 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Recent Posts
Friends to Visit
Blog Flux MapStats: Stats and Counter for Blog Hero
Powered by Movable Type 3.31

« 'Aliens Are My Brother' | Main | New Poll Testing Thing »

Advent of the Four-Day Work Week

May 27, 2008

An article in the Wall Street Journal tonight (Oil Prices Prompt Four-Day Week) talks about a group of smaller towns and community colleges switching to four ten-hour work days, and how larger local governments are showing interest as well:

"Michigan's Oakland County and New York's Suffolk County are both considering putting public employees on four-day workweeks. In Oklahoma, a resolution has been introduced in the state house of representatives recommending all state and local public employers move to a shortened week to provide relief from the cost of commuting."

I was thinking about this very topic only yesterday, when Alert Reader and BBQ Genius Jim mentioned a four-day work week. The price of oil and gas are the main drivers (no pun intended) (no, really) of this, and the savings could be considerable:

'"The things I've been reading say this is not a temporary hike in gas as we've seen in the months of the past," said L. Brooks Patterson, county executive for Oakland County, a wealthy area north of Detroit. "I don't think it stops at $4.20. I think it can easily be $5 or $6 a gallon."

Mr. Patterson is seeking approval from the county's Board of Commissioners to install a four-day, 40-hour workweek that would remain in place for "the foreseeable" future. As many as 1,500 of the county's 4,000 employees could end up working four 10-hour days a week instead of five eight-hour days.

Assuming gas stays at $4 a gallon and workers use two gallons for each round trip to work, Mr. Patterson estimated the savings from having 800 workers commuting only four days a week could save them a total of about $300,000 over the course of a year."

And work commutes are not the only thing on the American chopping block: this CNN article cites Department of Transportation figures that show Americans drove 11 billion fewer miles in March 2008 than March 2007. 11 Billion. With a B. I checked online and it's only 746 million miles to Saturn. So Americans drove less than more than the distance to Saturn in one month. (Sorry, it's getting late.) That seems pretty amazing.

I suspect four-day work weeks, telecommuting and video conferencing are all going to be looked at as possible solutions to mitigate the cost of gasoline, which is soon going to be somewhere between $4 and $18 a gallon, depending on the news story you're reading.

What do you think? Would you jump at a four-day work week? Or telecommute one day a week?

More at the WSJ (behind a subscription wall)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.carlschaad.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/870

Comments

I vote for three 12 hour days : )

I'm voting for three 6 hour days.

I used to telecommute, but I ended up working more like 60-80 hour weeks. Until I couldn't keep typing for long stretches, anyway.

What happens if you need to get your driver's license renewed and all the employees are on their 5th day off?

(You don't drive for three full days, that's what!)

I already work 10 hr days, but normally it's something like 8 in a row, or 6 in a row and one off and then 2 more in a row, and then I have a big break of days off. Unfortunately, I use that nice long stretch of time off to go out of town, so it really doesn't save me any gas at all.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)